|
Manuscript was received/ 20.11.2025
Received after review/ 05.12.2025
Accepted for printing 20.12.2025
Available online/ 30.12.2025
Abstract
The objective of the study was to determine the technological feasibility, economic efficiency of
the"grain" technology for fattening dairy bulls (ensuring free access of animals to specialized feed, straw
and water) as a reserve and prospects for increasing beef production at the state level in the conditions of
regions of Ukraine suffering from the growing problem of global warming. Methods. The scientific and
economic experiment was conducted in the conditions of the FOP "Sporysh R.B" of the Bilhorod-
Dnistrovskyi district of the Odessa region according to generally accepted methods in cattle breeding and
animal husbandry. Calves were provided with free access to starting feed containing 18.8% crude protein
from the first day after purchase. After the young animals reached a live weight of 100 kg, the animals
were fed the same type of feed containing 18.0% crude protein; 18.2% neutral detergent fiber. Animals
were provided with free access to cereal straw and water. Young animals were weighed individually with
an accuracy of ± 0.5 kg in the morning before feeding on the first day of each month until the moment of
sale when the animals reached a live weight of 500 kg. Results. Young animals under intensive growing
technology reached an average live weight of 102.9 ± 0.28 kg at the age of 3 months and were
subsequently transferred to intensive growing and fattening technology with planned average daily gains of
1000-1300 g. During the entire period of growing young animals to a live weight of 80 kg, 200 l of prepared
substitute was consumed or 25 kg of dry substitute/head/period, which in monetary equivalent
corresponds to 2150 UAH per 1 head. The over-repaired young stock of the Ukrainian black-and-white
dairy breed, under intensive technology of growing, rearing and fattening, reaches a live weight of 500 kg
in 415 days or 13.6 months. During the entire period of growing young stock to a live weight of 80 kg, 200 l
of whole milk replacer was consumed, or 25 kg of dry whole milk replacer and 80 kg of starter feed per
head per period. During the entire period of rearing and fattening young stock, 500 kg of straw and 2075.2
kg of feed per head are required. The role of straw is to stabilize the function of the rumen, prevent
metabolic disorders and ensure physiologically complete digestibility of concentrated feeds. In our
scientific and economic experiment, the consumption of straw and feed was observed in the ratio of
19.4%: 80.6%.
The use of the so-called "grain" technology for fattening young cattle should be a good alternative
to traditional Ukrainian types of fattening, which have practically become economically impractical in the
South and other regions of the country due to climate changes in the direction of global warming.
Conclusions. The cost of one day of feeding using the "grain" technology for fattening varied from
37.05 to 117.36 UAH per day per head, feeding costs for the entire period amounted to 30,479.82 UAH
per head. Given a sales price of 115.0 UAH per 1 kg of live weight, gross revenue amounted to 57,500
UAH per head, profit - 17,876.24 UAH per head, the level of profitability reached 45.11%, but it is worth
noting that the calculations were made without taking into account the costs of purchasing young cattle
and the cost of straw for bedding.
Keywords: cattle breeding, grain technology, fattening, cattle, beef, feeding, straw, compound feed.
|
|
REFERENCES
- 1. Susol, R. L., Kirovych, N. O., & Elfeel, A. A. A. (2024). Suchasni aspekty
promyslovoho vyrobnytstva moloka pidvyshchenoi yakosti z urakhuvanniam narostaiuchoi
problem hlobalnoho poteplinnia [Contemporary aspects of industrial production of high-quality
milk, taking into account the growing problem of global warming]. Odesa: Astroprynt [in
Ukranian].
- 2. Kostenko, V. I. (2018). Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva moloka i yalovychyny [Milk
and beef production technology]. Kyiv: Lira-K [in Ukranian].
- 3. Escarcha, J. F., Lassa, J. A., Zander. K. K. (2018). Livestock under climate
change: A systematic review of impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Climate (MDPI), 6(3), 54.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli6030054
- 4. Susol, R., & Stulnyk, I. (2024). Innovatsiina tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva
yalovychyny v Ukraini: problemy, strymuiuchi chynnyky ta perspektyvy [Innovative technology of
beef production in Ukraine: problems, constraining factors and prospects]. Suchasnyi stan ta
perspektyvy rozvytku tvarynnytstva Ukrainy v umovakh Yevrointehratsii [Current state and
prospects of the development of livestock farming in Ukraine in the conditions of European
integration. Procceding of the All-Ukrainian sci and pract conf. (September 19, 2024).
Kropyvnytskyi: KhD, 50–51 [in Ukrainian]. Retrieved from
https://www.ksau.kherson.ua/files/konferencii/2024/12/_2024.pdf (date of access: 14.11.2025).
- 5. Herrero, M., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Obersteiner, M., & Clark, W. C. (2013).
Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock
systems. PNAS, 110(52), 20888–20893. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308149110
- 6. FAO. Climate Smart Agriculture Sourcebook. Retrieved from
https://www.fao.org/climate-smart-agriculture-sourcebook/production-resources/module-b2-
livestock/chapter-b2-1/fr/ (date of access: 08.05.2025).
- 7. Thornton, P. K., van de Steeg, J., Notenbaert, A., & Herrero, M. (2009). The
impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: A review
of what we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, 101(3), 113–127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.05.002
- 8. Karamushka, V., Boychenko, S., Kuchma, T., & Zabarna, O. (2022). Trends in
the Environmental Conditions, Climate Change and Human Health in the Southern Region of
Ukraine. Sustainability, 14(9), 5664. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095664
- 9. Semenova, І., & Vicente-Serrano, S. M. (2024). Long-term variability and trends
of meteorological droughts in Ukraine. Intern. J. of Climatology, 44, 1849–1866.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8416
- 10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2023). Climate Change 2022 –
Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
- 11. Pryshchepa, Ya. (2021). Posukhy ta zsuv pryrodnykh zon. Yak hlobalni zminy
klimatu vplynut na Ukrainu [Droughts and shifts in natural zones. How global climate change will
affect Ukraine]. Suspilne. media: website [in Ukranian]. Retrieved from
https://suspilne.media/133665-posuhi-ta-zsuvprirodnih-zon-ak-globalni-zmini-klimatu-vplinut-na-
ukrainu/ (date access: 19.11.25) .
- 12. Ladyka, V. I., Khmelnychyi, L. M., & Povod. M. H. et al. (2023). Tekhnolohiia
vyrobnytstva ta pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva: pidruchnyk dlia aspirantiv [Technology of
production and processing of livestock products: a textbook for graduate students] / V. I.
Ladyka, L. M. Khmelnychoho (eds.). Odesa: Oldi+ [in Ukranian].
- 13. Soboliev, O. I., Nedashkivskyi, V. M., & Petryshak, R. A. (2022). Metodolohiia ta
orhanizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen u tvarynnytstvi [Methodology and organization of scientific
research in animal husbandry] / O. I. Soboliev (ed.). Bila Tserkva, 74–81 [in Ukranian].
- 14. Genís, S., Verdú, M., Cucurull, J., & Devant, M. (2021). Complete feed versus
concentrate and straw fed separately: Effect of feeding method on eating and sorting behavior,
rumen acidosis, and digestibility in crossbred Angus bulls fed high-concentrate diets. Animal
Feed Sci and Technology, 273, 114820 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114820
- 15. Mialon, M. M., Martin, C., Garcia, F., Menassol, J. B., Dubroeucq, H., Veissier,
I., & Micol, D. (2008). Effects of the forage-to-concentrate ratio of the diet on feeding behaviour
in young Blond d’Aquitaine bulls. Animals, 2(11), 1682–1691.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108002905
- 16. Manni, K., Rinne, M., Huuskonen, А., & Huhtanen, Р. (2018). Effects of
contrasting concentrate feeding strategies on meat quality of growing and finishing dairy bulls
offered grass silage and barley based diets. Meat Sci, 143, 184–189
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.033
- 17. Arbaoui, А., Gonzalo, G., Belanche, А., & Vega, А. (2025). Can feedlot cattle
increase productivity and decrease methane emissions by lowering the straw particle size?
Animal Feed Sci and Technology, 323, 116282.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116282
- 18. Angón, E., Requena, F., Caballero-Villalobos, J., Cantarero-Aparicio, M.,
Martínez-Marín, A. L., & Perea, J. M. (2022). Beef from Calves Finished with a Diet Based on
Concentrate Rich in Agro-Industrial By-Products: Acceptability and Quality Label Preferences in
Spanish Meat Consumers. Animals, 12(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010006
- 19. Avilés, C., Martínez, A. L., Domenech, V., & Peña, F. (2015). Effect of feeding
system and breed on growth performance, and carcass and meat quality traits in two
continental beef breeds. Meat Sci, 107, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.04.016
- 20. Albertí, P., Panea, B., Sañudo, C., & Olleta, J. L. (2008). Live weight, body size
and carcass characteristics of young bulls of fifteen European breeds. Livestock Sci, 114(1),
19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.04.010
- 21. Forbes, T. J., Irwin, J. H. D., & Raven, A. M. (2009). Use of coarsely chopped
barley straw in high concentrate diets for beef cattle. The J of Agricultural Sci, 73(3), 347–354.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600019961
- 22. Stabiliser Cattle Farm. BETTWS HALL: website. Retrieved from
https://www.bettwshall.com/farm (date of aссess: 14.11.2025).
- 23. Successful Stabilisers. HARPERS FEEDS: website. Retrieved from
https://www.harpersfeeds.co.uk/application/files/2214/3835/5453/Harpers_Newsletter_A
UG_AW.p (date of access: 14.11.2025).
- 24. Seidle, C. M., Ribeiro, G. O., & Penner, G. B. (2025). Penner. Impact of adding
water to a barley-based finishing feed lot diet on feed sorting behaviour and ruminal
fermentation for growing beef steers. Canad J Anim Sci, 105, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2025-0017
- 25. Koenig, К., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2011). Optimum extent of barley grain
processing and barley silage proportion in feedlot cattle diets: Growth, feed efficiency, and fecal
characteristics. Canad J of Plant Sci, 91(3), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas2010-039
- 26. Koenig, K. M., Chibisa, G. E., Penner, G. B., & Beauchemin, K. A. (2025).
Optimum roughage proportion in barley-based feedlot cattle diets: growth performance, feeding
behavior, and carcass traits. J Anim. Sci., 98(10). https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa299
- 27. Montenegro, B. J., Penner, G. B., Lardner, H. A., Larson, K. A., McKinnon, J. J.,
Gibb, D., McAllister, T. A, & Junioret, G. O R. (2025). Maximizing the utilization of wheat straw
in finishing beef cattle diets with canola or flax screenings supplementation: Growth
performance, carcass characteristics and economic analysis. J of Anim Sci, 103(3), 122–123.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf300.150
- 28. Genís, S., Verdú, M., Cucurull, J., & Devant, M. (2021). Complete feed versus
concentrate and straw fed separately: Effect of feeding method on eating and sorting behavior,
rumen acidosis, and digestibility in crossbred Angus bulls fed high-concentrate diets. Animal
Feed Sci and Technology, 273, 114820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114820
- 29. Salvin, H. E., Lees, A. M., Café, L. M., Colditz, I. G., & Lee, C. (2020). Welfare
of beef cattle in Australian feedlots: a review of the risks and measures. Animal Production Sci,
60, 1569–1590. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19621
- 30. The difference between grass-finished, grass-fed, and grain-finished.
ROAMINGBISONRANC: website. Retrieved from https://roamingbisonranch.com/grass-fed-
grass-finished-grain-finished-what-s-the-difference (date of access: 02.11.2025).
- 31. Why Kiwi Scientists Are Breeding Heat-Tolerant Dairy Cows. PASTURE.IO:
website. Retrieved from https://pasture.io/dairynz/scientists-breeding-heat-tolerant-cows (date of
access: 14.11.2025).
- 32. Daugaliyeva, A., Daugaliyeva, S., Ashanin, A., Kanatbayev, S., Beltramo, Ch.,
& Peletto, S. (2022). Study of cattle microbiota in different regions of Kazakhstan using 16S
metabarcoding analysis. Sci Rep, 12, 16410 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20732-4
- 33. Danylin, O. (2022). Vyhotovleno v Ukraini [Made in Ukraine.]. Agrotimes :
website [in Ukranian]. Retrieved from https://agrotimes.ua/interview/marmurova-yalovychyna-
vygotovleno-v-ukrayini (date of access: 14.11.2025).
- 34. Moraru, I. (2019). TOP-7 faktoriv, yaki zavazhaiut povnotsinnomu rozvytku
miasnoho skotarstva v Ukraini [Moraru I. TOP-7 factors that hinder the full development of meat
cattle breeding in Ukraine]. Agravery.com. : website [in Ukranian]. Retrieved from
https://agravery.com/uk/posts/show/top-7-faktoriv-aki-zavazaut-povnocinnomu-rozvitku-
masnogo-skotarstva-v-ukraini (date access: 14.11.2025).
|