ERGONOMIC STUDIES OF THE PROCESS OF ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION OF PIGS


Download the article 

UDC: 636.4.082.453.5:331.101.1

DOI: 10.37143/2786-7730-2023-1(79)03

REFERENCIS АРА style: Zhukorskyi, O. M., Tsereniuk, O. M., Akimov, O. V., Chereuta, Yu. V., Kryhina, N. V., Borzhak, T. M., Babich, M., & Kropyvets-Domanska, K. (2023). Erhonomichni doslidzhennia protsesu shtuchnoho osimeninnia [Ergonomie research of the process of artificial insemination of pigs]. Svynarstvo i ahropromyslove vyrobnytstvo [Pig Breeding and Agroindustrial Production]. Poltava, 1(79), 36-53 [in Ukrainian]. doi: 10.37143/2786-7730-2023-1(79)03

O. M. Zhukorskyi, Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor, academician of the National Academy of Sciences, academician-secretary Department of Zootechnics of the National Academy of Sciences
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-8517
E-mail:o_zhukorskiy@ukr.net
The National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Mikhail Omelyanovich-Pavlenko Str., 9, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01010
O. M. Tsereniuk,Doctor of Agricultural Sciences associate professor, director of the Institute of Pig Breeding and AIP of the NAAS,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4797-9685
E-mail:tserenyuk@gmail.com
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
O. V. Akimov leading researcher, lab. breeding and selection of pigs
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1938-0459
E-mail:akimov.kharkiv@gmail.com
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
Yu. V. Chereuta Acting Head of the Laboratory of Innovative Technologies and experimental livestock facilities
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-391
E-mail:chereuta1@ukr.net
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
N. V. Kryhina junior researcher of the lab. economic analysis and forecasting
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0569-6345
E-mail:knatalina@ukr.net
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
T. M. Borzhak researcher of the laboratory of scientific research on intellectual issues ownership and marketing of innovations,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-9026
E-mail:tania96753@gmail.com
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
M. Babich doctor of engineering, professor of the department of pig breeding and biotechnology of the faculty animal husbandry and bioeconomy
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-627X
E-mail:marek.babicz@up.lublin.pl
University o f Natural Sciences in Lublin, Poland Akademitska, Str.,13, Lublin, Poland, 20-950
K. Kropyvets-Domanska Doctor of Engineering
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7722-561X
E-mail:kinga.kropiwiec@up.lublin.pl
University o f Natural Sciences in Lublin, Poland Akademitska, Str.,13, Lublin, Poland, 20-950

Abstract

Goal. To research the comparison of artificial insemination processes in a number of pig farms based on the developed theoretical principles of ergonomic assessment. Methods. Experimental research was carried out at “Agrofirma “Khlibne ” LLC, FG “Shubske ”, SE EE “Hontarivka” of Institute of Animal Science NAAS, and FOP “Syvoplias” of Kharkiv region based on traditional approaches. As a basis for dividing the process of artificial insemination of pigs into technological operations, the farm of FG "Shubske" was taken, as such, where the process of artificial insemination of pigs is the most saturated with technological operations. According to the determined technological operations of the process of artificial insemination of sows, more generalized characteristics of the labor process, the number, sequence and duration of individual component movements were determined, with the classification of labor movements by determination, severity, naturalness, purpose, direction and reach in accordance with the methods, based on the basic systems of trace elements time standards, normative documents and recommendations. The indexes obtained experimentally were worked out by the method of variational statistics, using MS Excel software. The results. The process of artificial insemination in different farms has certain differences. The process of artificial insemination from a number of evaluated farms is the most saturated with technological operations in the breeding farm of FG "Shubske". Regarding different farms, there are differences in the use of stimulating devices, the load on the operator and the way of housing sows during insemination. According to the evaluated farms, the test boar is used twice a day in FG “Shubske ”, once in the morning in the SE EE “Hontarivka” of Institute of Animal Science NAAS, in FOP “Syvoplias V.V.” the detection of sows in estrus occurs without the involvement of a test boar. Also, the anthropometric, physiological and individual characteristics of the artificial insemination operator were evaluated for two operators for each of the evaluated farms. Weight indexes between operators in different farms differed more significantly ( р< 0.05). At the same time, no discrepancies were found in terms of arm length. Regarding disagreements between operators within individual farms, the greatest consolidation in terms of height and live weight was found in FOP "Syvoplias V. V.". The largest discrepancies in the length of the hands of the operators were found in SE “Hontarivka” of Institute of Animal Science NAAS. In the vast majority of cases, unconsolidated values were obtained for pulse and blood pressure indexes. Conclusions. On the basis of ergonomic studies of the process of artificial insemination of pigs in the conditions of three different farms, the differences have been determined, which indicate the need to adjust individual technological approaches and carry out the conversion of premises for artificial insemination of pigs in order to further increase the efficiency of the work of technicians and the procedure of artificial insemination as a whole in the SE EE ”Hontarivka” » of Institute of Animal Science NAAS and in FOP "Syvoplias V. V."

Key words: sow, artificial insemination, ergonomics, machine, reproduction, sperm production.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Kremez, M. I., Povod, M. H., Mykhalko, O. H., Verbelchuk, T. V., Verbelchuk, S. P., Shcherbyna, O. V., & Kalynychenko, H. I. (2022). Vidtvorni yakosti svynomatok riznykh selektsiinykh rivniv [Reproductive qualities of sows of different breeding levels]. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva [Technology of production and processing of livestock products]. Bila Tserkva, 1, 50-64 [in Ukrainian].
  • 2. Ivanov, V. O., Onyshchenko, A. O., Zasukha, L. V., & Hryhorenko, V. L. (2020). Obladnannia dlia dvofaznoi tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia svynei. [Equipment for two-phase pig breeding technology]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky Prychornomoria [Ukrainian Black Sea Region agrarian science], 2, 87-94 doi: .10.31521/2313 -092X/2020-2(106)-10 [in Ukrainian].
  • 3. Instruktsiia zi shtuchnoho osimeninnia svynei. Instruktsiia z vedennia pleminnoho obliku u svynarstvi [Instructions on artificial insemination of pigs. Instructions for keeping pedigree records in pig breeding] (2003). Kyiv: VPTs «Kyivskyi universytet» [in Ukrainian].
  • 4. Yablonskyi, V. A. (2002). Praktychne akusherstvo, hinekolohiia ta biotekhnolohiia vidtvorennia tvaryn z osnovamy androlohii [Practical obstetrics, gynecology and biotechnology of animal reproduction with the basics of andrology]. Kyiv: Meta [in Ukrainian].
  • 5. Oh, S. H., See, M. T., Long, T. E., & Galvin, J. M. (2006). Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe total sperm cells per Свинарство і агропромислове виробництво. 2023. Вип. 1(79) Pig Breeding and Agroindustrial Production, 2023, 1(79) ejaculate over the reproductive lifetime of boars. Journal of Animal Science. Vol. 84. P .538-545.
  • 6. Wolf, J., & Smital, J. (2009). Effect singenetic evaluation for sementraitsin Czech Large White and Czech Landrace boars. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54(8), 349-358. doi: 10.17221/1658-cjas
  • 7. Khramkova, O., & Povod, M. (2009). Otsinka knuriv-plidnykiv suchasnykh henotypiv za pokaznykamy yikhnoi spermoproduktyvnosti [Evaluation of stud boars of modern genotypes based on their sperm productivity]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Tvarynnytstvo» [Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock.]. Sumy, 3(38), 91-95. doi: 10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2019.3.11 [in Ukrainian].
  • 8. Akimov, O. V., Martyniuk, I. M., Tsereniuk, O. M., & Chereuta, Yu. V. (2022). Ob’iemno-planuvalni rishennia rekonstruktsii tsekhu vidtvorennia svynei z vprovadzhenniam shtuchnoho osimeninnia [Volumetric and planning solutions for the reconstruction of the pig reproduction shop with the introduction of artificial insemination]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu tvarynnytstva NAAN [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science of the NAAS]. Kharkiv, 127, 59-69. doi: 10.32900/2312-8402-2022-127-59-69 [in Ukrainian].
  • 9. Tsereniuk, O. M., Akimov, O. V., Bobryts'ka, O. M., Khokhlov, A. M., Susol, R. L., Miroshnykova, O. S., Martyniuk, I. M., Palii A. P., & Chalyi O. I. (2020). Pidvyshchennia henetychnoho potentsialu produktyvnosti v svynarstvi Ukrainy [Increasing the genetic potential of productivity in pig breeding of Ukraine]. Kharkiv: FOP Brovin O. V. [in Ukrainian].
  • 10. Maside C., Recuero S., Salas-Huetos A., Ribas-Maynou J., & Yeste M. (2023). An update on the methods for semen quality evaluation in swine-from farm to the lab. Animal, 17(3), 100720. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100720.
  • 11. Mellagi, A. P. G., Will, K. J., Quirino, M., Bustamante-Filho, I. C., Ulguim, R. d. R. & Bortolozzo, F. P. (2022). Update on artificial insemination: Semen, techniques, and sow fertility. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 1-11. doi: 10.1002/mrd.23 643
  • 12. Waberski, D., Riesenbeck, A., Schulze, M., Weitze, K. F., & Johnson, L. (2019) . Application of preserved boar semen for artificial insemina-tion : Past, present and future challenges. Theriogenology, 137, 2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.05.030
  • 13. Riesenbeck, A., Schulze, M., Rbdiger, K., Henning, H., & Waberski, D. (2015). Quality control of boar sperm processing: Implications fromEuropean AI centres and two spermatology reference laboratories. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 50, 1-4. doi: 10.1111/rda.12573
  • 14. Bielikov, A. A., Sushko, O. B., Tsereniuk, O. M. Martyniuk, I. M., Akimov, O. V., Savelieva, M. S., Chereuta, Yu. V., Stryzhak, T. A., & Berestova, L. Ye. (2020) . Vidtvorennia stada svynei biotekhnolohichnymy metodamy [Pig herd reproduction by biotechnological methods]. Kharkiv: Instytut tvarynnytstva NAAN [in Ukrainian].
  • 15. Martyniuk, I. M., Tsereniuk, O. M., & Akimov, O. V. (2019). Zaplidnenist ta bahatoplidnist svynomatok zalezhno vid kratnosti osimeninnia u rizni pory roku [Fertilization and multiple fertility of sows depending on the frequency of insemination in different seasons]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu tvarynnytstva NAAN [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal 50 Science of the NAAS]. Kharkiv, 121, 156-162. doi: 10.32900/2312-8402-2019-121- 156-162 [in Ukrainian].
  • 16. Khaldarov, H. A., & Dzhamaldinova, M. B. (2022). Proyektirovaniye rabochego mesto tekhnologicheskogo protsessa shit'ya s pomoshch'i ergonomiki [Designing the workplace of the technological process of sewing with the help of ergonomics. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Development], 6, 70-76 [in Russian].
  • 17. Boltianskyi, O. V., & Boltianska, N. I. (2019). Osnovni tendentsii rozvytku ahrotekhnolohii i silskohospodarskoi tekhniky [The main trends in the development of agricultural technologies and agricultural machinery. Tekhnichnyy prohres u tvarynnytstvi ta kormovyrobnytstvi, materialy VIII Vseukrainskoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii [Technical progress in animal husbandry and fodder production, Proceedings VIII of the All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical ^ ^ єгє^ є]. Smt. Hlevakha Kyyivs'koi oblasti, Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  • 18. Shablia, V. P. (2013). Erhonomichni ta etolohichni metody otsinky tekhnolohii pryhotuvannia ta rozdavannia kormiv [Ergonomic and ethological methods of the evaluation of feed preparation and distribution technologies]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu tvarynnytstva NAAN [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science of the NAAS]. Kharkiv, 109 (2), 195-207 [in Ukrainian].
  • 19. Novytskyi, A. V. (2016). Ohliad teoretychnykh doslidzhen nadiinoho funktsionuvannia skladnykh tekhnichnykh system u tvarynnytstvi [Review of theoretical studies of reliable functioning of complex technical systems in animal husbandry]. Naukovyy visnyk NUBiP Ukrayiny [Scientific bulletin of NUBiP of Ukraine]. Seriia: Tekhnika ta enerhetyka APK [Series: Technology and energy of agricultur], 254, 42-42 [in Ukrainian].
  • 20. Trask, C. (2013). Preliminary ergonomic evaluation of barn tasks in intensive swine production. Journal of Agromedicine, 18(4), 368-378.
  • 21. Depoudent, C., & Fayot, C. (2017). Ergonomic analysis of work organization in pig farrowing rooms: statement and recommendations. Jourmes de la Recherche Porcine en France, 47, 257-258.
  • 22. Ibatullin, I. I., & Zhukors'kyi, O. M. (2017). Metodolohiia ta orhanizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen' u tvarynnytstvi [Methodology and organization of scientific research in animal husbandry]. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka [in Ukrainian].
  • 23. Chereuta, Yu. V. (2014). Erhonomichni doslidzhennia protsesu shtuchnoho osimeninnia svynei [Ergonomic research of the process of artificial insemination of pigs]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu tvarynnytstva NAAN [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science NAAS], 112, 201-205 [in Ukrainian].
  • 24. Shablia, V. P. (2012). Metodolohichni zasady erhonomichnykh doslidzhen' u tvarynnytstvi na prykladi protsesu doinnia [Methodological principles of ergonomic research in animal husbandry on the example of the milking process]. Naukovotekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu tvarynnytstva NAAN [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science_NAAS]. Kharkiv, 107, 177-184 [in Ukrainian].
  • 25. Kovalenko, V. P., Khalak, V. I., Nezhlukchenko, T. I., & Papakina, N. S. (2010). Biometrychnyi analiz minlyvosti oznak sil's'kohospodars'kykh tvaryn i ptytsi [Biometric analysis of the variability of characteristics of agricultural animals and poultry]. Kherson: Oldi [in Ukrainian].
  • 26. Baranovskiy, D. I., Khokhlov, A. M., & Getmanets, O. M. (2017). Biometriya v MS Excel [Biometrics in MS Excel]. Kharkiv: FLP Brovin A. V. [in Russian].