<

PROBLEMS OF CHLAMIDIOSIS IN ANIMALS AND WAYS TO SOLVE THEM (review)


Download the article 

 

DOI: 10.37143/0371-4365-2021-75-76-12

O. A. Bindiug, – к. с.-г. н., стар. наук. співр. лаб. фізіології відтворення,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8875-9382
E-mail:obindiug@gmail.com
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
V. O. Rokotianska. к. с.-г. н., наук. співр. лаб. фізіології відтворення ,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-0989
E-mail:rokotianska@ukr.net
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013

Abstract

It was conducted a chamber analysis of scientific trends in solving the problems of chlamydia in pigs and focusing on the most effective methods of the disease prevention and the treatment of animals. It has been determined that chlamydia are positioned as bacteria and viruses, and therefore are quite common among farm animals, and poultry: about 90 million new cases of chlamydia disease in animals, in particular pigs, are registered in the world. Some types of chlamydia threaten the health of people and animals, reducing the productivity of the latter. Chlamydiae are Gram-negative, obligate intracellular bacteria with a complex developmental cycle consisting of two stages, such as the elementary body (infectious) and the reticulum body. This determines their latency and resistance to antibiotics and other therapeutic drugs. It has been determined that chlamydia are similar to viruses and have the ability to cause dangerous formations in the body of animals. Chlamydial disease in pigs manifests as conjunctivitis, pneumonia, and pseudomembranous or necrotizing enteritis, which is confirmed by the experimental reproduction of the infection in gnotobiotic pigs using clinical isolates. In addition, chlamydia is associated with pericarditis, polyarthritis and polyserositis in piglets and numerous reproductive problems such as vaginal discharge from the sow, disruption of the sexual cycle, abortions, mummification of fetuses, the birth of weak piglets, the increased perinatal and neonatal mortality, as well as orchitis, epididymitis and urethritis in boars. However, for most of these diseases, the ultimate role of chlamydia is not fully defined. Chlamydia is considered a pathogen in pigs, chlamydia tests are not performed in most available veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Chlamydia often occurs together with other pathogens, and this phenomenon complicates the recovery of pigs to a certain extent. Infection of animals with chlamydia occurs as a result of direct contact of their mucous membranes with the causative agent of the disease. The systematic control of the presence of chlamydia in animals of the breeding herd will prevent a decrease in their productivity, that is, the substantial economic losses. The study of chlamydia by the molecular genetic method (PCR) will allow to identify sick animals and carry out their illumination, which is the most promising and will ensure the detection of sick animals.

Key words: chlamydia, infection, bacteria, animal, pig, pathogenesis, symptoms, diagnostic methods.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Hammerschlag, M. R. (2002). The intracellular life of chlamydiae. Semin. Pediatr Infect Dis., 13(4), 239–248. doi: 10.1053/spid.2002.127201
  • 2. Willingan, D. A, & Beamer, P. D. (1955). Isolation of a transmissible agent from pericarditis of swine. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 126, 118–122.
  • 3. Guenov, I. (1961). Etudes sur la pericardite fibrineuse des porcelets due au virus de l'ornithose. Bull. Off Int. Epizoot., 55, 1465–1473.
  • 4. Borel, N., Polkinghorne, A., & Pospischil, A. (2018). A Review on Chlamydial Diseases in Animals: Still a Challenge for Pathologists. Veterinary Pathology, 55(3), 374–390. doi: 10.1177/0300985817751218.
  • 5. Kölbl, O. (1969). Untersuchungen über das Vorkommen von Miyagawanellen beim Schwein. Wiener Tierärztl Monatssch., 56, 355–361.
  • 6. Kölbl, O. Burtscher, H, & Hebenstreit, J. (1970). Polyarthritis bei Schlachtsweinen. Mikrobiologische, histologische und fleischhygienische Untersuchungen und Aspekte. Wiener Tierärztl Monatssch, 57, 355–361.
  • 7. Leonard, I., Wittenbrink, M. M., & Bisping, W. (1988). Nachweis von Chlamydia psittaci im Kot von Schweinen. Berl Munch Tierärztl Wschr., 101, 124–128.
  • 8. Plagemann, O. (1981). Chlamydien als Abortursache beim Schwein und als Differentialdiagnose zum Smedi-Komplex. Tierärztl Umsch., 36, 842–846.
  • 9. Rogers, D. G., Andersen, A. A, Hogg, A., Nielsen, D. L., & Huebert, M. A. (1993). Conjunctivitis and Keratoconjunctivitis associated with Chlamydiae in swine. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 203(9), 1321–1323.
  • 10. Schiller, I, Koesters, R, Weilenmann, R, Thoma, R, Kaltenboeck, B, Heitz, P, & Pospischil, A. (1997). Mixed infections with porcine Chlamydia trachomatis/pecorum and infections with ruminant. Chlamydia psittaci serovar 1 associated with abortions in swine. Vet. Microbiol., 58(2–4), 251–260. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(97)00154-5.
  • 11. Szeredi, L, Schiller, I, Sydler, T, Guscetti, F., Heinen, E, Corboz, ... & Pospischil, A. (1996). Intestinal Chlamydia in finishing pigs. Vet. Pathol., 33(4), 369– 374. doi: 10.1177/030098589603300401.
  • 12. Unterweger, C, Inic-Kanada, A, Setudeh, S, Knecht, C, Duerlinger, S, Stas, M., ... & Barisani-Asenbauer, T. (2021). Characteristics of Chlamydia suis Ocular Infection in Pigs. Pathogens, 10, 1103. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091103
  • 13. Nie, L. B, Liang, Q. L, Zou, Y., Gao, Y. H., Zhao, Q., Hu, G. X., & Zhu, X. Q. (2018). First Report of Chlamydia Seroprevalence in Farmed Wild Boars in China. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases, 18(9), 504–508. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2018.2272
  • 14. Sheng, C. Y, Gong, Q. L., Ma, B. Y., Liu, Y., Ge, G. Y., Li, D. L., ... & Du, R. (2021). Prevalence of Chlamydia in Pigs in China from 1985 to 2020: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis., 21(7), 517–533. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2694.
  • 15. Jelocnik, M., Taylor-Brown, A., O’Dea, С., Anstey, S., Bommana, S., Masters, N., ... & Polkinghorne, A. (2019). Detection of a range of genetically diverse chlamydiae in Australian domesticated and wild ungulates. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 66(3), 1132–1137. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13171
  • 16. Wu-Wen, Sun, Nian-Zhang, Zhang, Yuan-Huan, Kang, Lei, Zhang & Xiao-Feng, Shan (2020). First Report of Chlamydia Seroprevalence in Slaughter Pigs in Shandong Province, Eastern China. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 20(1), 51–53. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2019.2472.
  • 17. Kieckens, E., Van den Broeck, L., Van Gils, M., Morré, S. & Vanrompay, D. (2018). Co-Occurrence of Chlamydia suis DNA and Chlamydia suis-Specific Antibodies in the Human Eye. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 18(12), 677–682. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2017.2256.
  • 18. Everett, K. D., Bush, R. M, & Andersen, A. A. (1999). Emended description of the order Chlamydiales, proposal of Parachlamydiaceae fam. nov. and Simkaniaceae fam. nov., each containing one monotypic genus, revised taxonomy of the family Chlamydiaceae, including a new genus and five new species, and standards for the identification of organisms. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol., 49(2), 415–440. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-415.
  • 19. Kerr, K., Entrican, G., McKeever, D., & Longbottom, D. (2005). Immunopathology of Chlamydophila abortus infection in sheep and mice. Res Vet Sci., 78(1), 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2004.08.004.
  • 20. Everett, K. D. (2000). Chlamydia and Chlamydiales: more than meets the eye. Vet. Microbiol. 75(2), 109–126. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00213-3.
  • 21. Van Gils, M., Aeby, S., Vanrompay, D., & Greub, G. (2015). Absence of Chlamydia-like organisms in pigs. New Microbes and New Infections, 7, 31–32. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.04.007.
  • 22. Ksonz, I. M. (2012). Khlamidiozy tvaryn [Chlamydia of animals]. Poltava : Oriiana.
  • 23. Taylor-Brown, A., & Polkinghorne, A. (2017). New and emerging chlamydial infections of creatures great and small. New Microbes and New Infections, 18, 28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2017.04.004.
  • 24. Stephan, S., Guerra, D., Pospischil, A., Hilbe, M., Weissenböck, H., Novotný, L., & Borel. N. (2014). Chlamydiaceae and chlamydia-like organisms in free- living small mammals in europe and afghanistan. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 50(2), 195–204. doi: 10.7589/2013-08-194.
  • 25. Ksonz, I. M., & Pochernyaev, K. F. (2010). The method of determining the DNA of bacteria of the Chlamydiaceae family in the polymerase chain reaction by amplifying a fragment of the gene of the main membrane protein (MOMP): pat. 51635 Ukraine: IPK A 61 K 39/118; statement 19.01.2010; published 26.07.2010, Bull. No. 14. 10. Kyiv : State Department of Intellectual Property
  • 26. Ksonz, I. M., Pochernyaev, K. F., & Kurman A. F. (2006). The method of determining DNA, causative agents of chlamydial infections in the multiplex polymerase chain reaction: pat. 11834 Ukraine. Kyiv : State Department of Intellectual Property.
  • 27. Ksonz, I. M., & Pochernyaev, K. F. (2008). The method of determining the DNA of seven causative agents of chlamydial infections of mammals and birds in one polymerase chain reaction: pat. 34868 Ukraine. Kyiv: State Department of Intellectual Property.