<

INFLUENCE OF CLIMATIC FACTORS ON THE REPRODUCTIVE ABILITY OF SOWS


Download the article 

 

DOI: 10.37143/0371-4365-2021-75-76-04

S. M Korinnyiк. с.-г. наук, с. н. с., доцент кафедри біотехнології та хімії,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1649-3079
E-mail:korinny_sergey@ukr.net
Poltava State Agrarian University Skovoroda Str., 1/3, Poltava, Ukraine, 36003
A. O. Onyshchenko, к. с.-г. н., с.н.с, в.о. зав. лаб. екологічної безпеки у тваринництві,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0684-1201
E-mail:geroi76@ukr.net
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
L. G. Peretiatko, к. с.-г. н., ст. н. с, зав. лаб. селекції,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0919-8482
E-mail:lidipllper@ukr.net
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013

Abstract

The aim of the research was genotyping animals of Ukrainian pig breeds according to microsatellite loci of the genome for further creation and implementation of the methodology for determining gene complexes of pig adaptability. Research methods: zootechnical – the analysis of genealogy and the productivity indexes of animals of different breeds; bioinformation - work with databases of the primary genome sequences for the design of oligonucleotide primers; molecular genetic - nucleic acid extraction, the determination of purity and concentration of DNA preparations, the amplification of microsatellite loci in PCR with subsequent electrophoretic separation of the amplification products in denaturing gel; statistical – the determination of population-genetic parameters on the basis of typing data on microsatellite loci, the relationship of microsatellite loci with performance indexes, the search for adaptive complexes. It was carried out genotyping animals of the Ukrainian meat breed in SE “RF Elita MIW named after V. M. Remeslo NAAS "of Kyiv region for 6 microsatellite loci with tetranucleotide repeats, a panel of primers of its own design. It was found the fact that the average number of alleles per locus was 5.2 alleles. The level of actual heterozygosity was 0.830, while the expected heterozygosity was 0.780. However, this difference is not significant. DNA typing animals for 6 loci of microsatellite DNA of 17 heads of Poltava meat breed of SE "EB Nadiia" was carried out. As a result of genotyping, the average number of alleles per locus was 3.8. The actual and expected heterozygosity levels were 0.680 and 0.730, respectively. By loci of microsatellite DNA, we found in animals of Myrhorod breed: for locus FH3628 – 5 alleles of 200-228 nucleotides, FH1865 – 5 alleles (size from 109 to 129 nucleotides), FH4219 – 2 alleles of 80 and 92 nucleotides, FH1885 – 4 alleles from 205 up to 213 nucleotides, FH3764 – 2 alleles 138 and 146 nucleotides, and for FH4231 – 2 alleles 116 and 120 nucleotides. The level of actual heterozygosity was 0.860, while the expected heterozygosity was 0.810. Thus, in three breeds of Ukrainian selection for 6 loci of microsatellite DNA with tetranucleotide repeat, the level of actual heterozygosity was in the range of 0.680 in animals of Poltava meat breed to 0.860 in animals of Myrhorod breed. The level of expected heterozygosity is 0.730 in animals of Poltava meat breed to 0.810 in Myrhorod breed. The high level of heterozygosity, as well as the average number of alleles per locus allows to search for alleles and genotypes associated with the adaptability of animals in breeds of pigs of Ukrainian selection.

Key words: pigs, microsatellite loci, genome, average number of alleles, level of heterozygosity, population, variability

REFERENCES

  • 1. Konarev, A. V. (1998). Ispolzovanie molekulyarnyih markerov v rabote s geneticheskimi resursami rasteniy [Use of molecular markers in work with plant genetic resources]. Selskohozyaystvennaya biologiya, 5, P. 3-25 [in Russian].
  • 2. Litt, M., & Luty, J. A. (1989). A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am. J. Hum. Genet, 44, 388-396. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1715430/
  • 3. Ellegren, H. (2004). Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(6), 435–445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1348
  • 4. Rosenberg, N. A., Pritchard, J. K., Weber, J. L., Cann, H. M., Kidd, K. K., Zhivotovsky, L. A., & Feldman, M. W. (2002). Genetic structure of human populations. Science, 20, 2381–2385. doi: 10.1126/science.1078311
  • 5. Zimnitskiy, A. N., Bashkatov, S. A., & Urazbaev, V. N. (2005). Tandemnyie povtoryi DNK i kontseptsiya matrichnogo sinteza proteoglikanov [Tandem DNA repeats and the concept of matrix synthesis of proteoglycans]. Moscow: Labirint [in Russian].
  • 6. Wintero, A. K., Fredholm, M., & Thomsen, P. D. (1992). Variable (dGdT)n -(dC-dA)n sequences in the porcine genome. Genomics, 12(2), 281–288. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90375-3
  • 7. Laval, G. SanCristobal, M., & Chevalet, C. (2002). Measuring genetic distances between breeds: use of some distances in various short term evolution models. Genetics Selection Evolution, 34, 481–507. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-34-4-481
  • 8. Cuadrado, A., & Schwarzacher, T. (1998). The chromosomal organization of simple sequence repeats in wheat and rye genomes. Chromosoma, 107(8), 587–594. doi: 10.1007/s004120050345
  • 9. Guy-Franck, R., Kerrest, A. & Dujon, B. (2008). Comparative Genomics and Molecular Dynamics of DNA Repeats in Eukaryotes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 72(4), 686–727. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00011-08 10. Putman A. I., & Carbone, I. (2014). Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies. Ecology and Evolution, 4(22), 4399– 4428. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1305
  • 11. Eggert, L. S., Beadell, J. S., McClung, A., McIntosh, C. E., & Fleischer, R. C. (2009). Evolution of Microsatellite Loci in the Adaptive Radiation of Hawaiian Honeycreepers. Journal of Heredity, 100(2), 137–147. doі: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esn111
  • 12. Gama, L. T., Martínez, A. M, Carolino, I., Landi, V., Delgado, J. V., Vicente, A. A., Vega-Pla, J. L., Cortés, O., Sousa, C. O. & BIOPIG Consortium (2013). Genetic structure, relationships and admixture with wild relatives in native pig breeds from Iberia and its islands. Genetics Selection Evolution, 45, 18–32. doi: 10.1186/1297- 9686-45-18
  • 13. Beyea, M., Neumanna, P., Schmitzováb, J., Klaudinyb, J., Albertb, S., Simúthc, J., Felderc, M., & Moritz, R. F. A. (1998). A simple, non-radioactive DNA fingerprinting method for identifying patrilines in honeybee colonies. Apidologie, 29(3), 255–263. doi: 10.1051/apido:19980305
  • 14. Moritz, R. F. A., Kryger, P., Koeniger, G., Koeniger, N., Estoup, A., & Tingek, S. (1995). High degree of polyandry in Apis dorsata queens detected by microsatellite variability. Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 37, 35. doi:10.1007/BF00174141
  • 15. Sokolov, B. P., & Dzhemelinskiy, V. V. (1989). Vyidelenie vyisokomolekulyarnoy eukarioticheskoy DNK s ispolzovaniem atsetata kaliya [Isolation of high molecular weight eukaryotic DNA using potassium acetate]. Molekulyarnaya genetika, mikrobiologiya i virusologiya, 6, 45–46 [in Russian].
  • 16. Walsh, P. S., Metzger, D. A., & Higuchi, R. (2013). Chelex-100 as a Medium for Extraction of DNA for PCR-Based Typing from Forensic Material. BioTechniques, 54(3), 134–139. doi: 10.2144/000114018
  • 17. Technical Manual GenePrint™ STR Systems: Instructions for use of Product (1996). Promega Corporation.
  • 18. Peakall, R., & Smouse, P. E. (2006). GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288–295. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x