DOI: 10.37143/0371-4365-2021-75-76-02

V. G. Tsybenko,candidate of agricultural sciences, senior researcher, laboratories of innovative technologies and experimental livestock facilities,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3932-8508
E-mail:dpdgim.dekabristiv@gmail.com
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
L. P. Hryshina,Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, senior researcher, chief researcher, pig breeding and selection laboratory
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6292-0257
E-mail:ludpavgri@ukr.net
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013
L. G. Peretiatko, candidate of agricultural sciences, senior researcher, head of the breeding laboratory,
ORCID:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0919-8482
E-mail:lidipllper@ukr.net
Institute of Pig Breeding and agroindustrial production NAAS, Shvedska Mohyla Str., 1, Poltava, Ukraine, 36013

Abstract

It is presented the comparative analysis of a manifestation of reproductive qualities of purebred and two-breed sows in combination with boars of different genotypes and the definition of the best forms for further receiving highly productive marketable young pigs. The researches were conducted in the conditions of SE EE "im. Dekabrystiv "of Institute of Pig Breeding and AIP NAAS of Myrhorod district of Poltava region. 5 groups of young animals were formed for the experiment: 1 – (LW×Landrace)×Landrace, 2 – (LW×Landrace) x Duroc, 3 – LW×Duroc, 4 – Landrace×Landrace, 5 – Myrhorod breed x Myrhorod breed. It was determined the fact that by index of the number of piglets born, sows of the combination (LW×L)×D were dominated the purebred Landrace females by 7.41 % (p≤0.05) and pigs of Myrhorod breed by 9.59 % (p≤0.001). The significant variability of the rich fertility index in the sows of the combination of LW×L was revealed: the standard deviation in them was 3.56 heads (compared to 1.22 in other groups), the indicators of the magnitude of variation and the coefficient of variability were also the largest (respectively 10 heads and 10.71 %), which is confirmed by the value of the coefficient of excess – 2.689. The crossbred sows with the LW×L combination had the highest litter weight, they exceeded the sows of Myrhorod breed by 44.2 % (p 0.001) and tended to exceed the sows of Landrace breed by 3.51 %. It should be noted that the weight of the litter at weaning in Landrace sows was 68.3 kg, with a positive asymmetry – 0.743 and an excess coefficient of 0.467; the coefficient of variation was low, which indicates targeted selection for growth intensity in pigs of this breed. According to the results of the researches, the level of combination and the effect of crossing genotypes by multiplicity and the litter weight at weaning were determined. The level of combination of genotypes by crossing exceeded the level of combination by purebred breeding and had positive values in terms of fertility. The highest value of this indexes was obtained from the combination of crossbred sows with boars of Duroc breed – +0.70 units.The next stage of researches was to determine the effect of heterosis. The efficiency of combination (LW×L)×D was determined – 106.93 points for the multiplicity. According to the index of litter weight at weaning, the effect of heterosis was found out at crossing and in pigs of Landrace breed (for purebred breeding). Its highest value was determined in the combination of LW×L – 111.34 %, which indicates the effective use of this combination in the first stage of hybridization. The use of industrial crossbreeding and hybridization in the herd of SE "EE im. Dekabrystiv” helps to increase the multiplicity rate of sows, as well as proves the effectiveness of the use of crossbred sows of the combination LW×L in the first stage of the hybridization to increase the growth rate of young animals. Indexes of the level of combination and the effect of heterosis should be used to assess the effectiveness of crossbreeding in pig breeding.

Key words: sows, multiplicity, litter weight, crossbreeding, heterosis, hybridization, genotype.

REFERENCES

• 1. Avalos, E., & Smith, C. (1985). Selecting for litter size. Pig Farming, 38 (12), 65.
• 2. Sheiko, R. I. (2012). Priemy i metody v selekcii svinej, obespechivajushhie vysokij jeffekt geterozisa v sistemah gibridizacii [Techniques and methods in pig breeding, providing a high effect of heterosis in hybridization systems]. Zhodino [in Russian].
• 3. Zhirnov, I. V. (1974). Geterozis v vosproizvodstve svinej [Heterosis in the reproduction of pigs]. Moscow: Colossus [in Russian].
• 4. Kozlovsky, V. G., Lebedev, Yu. V., & Tonyshev, I. I. (1987). Gibridizatsiya v promyshlennom svinovodstve [Hybridization in industrial pig breeding]. Moscow: Rosselkhozizdat [in Russian].
• 5. Loban, N. A. (2012). Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie prijomi i metody sozdanija i ispol'zovanija svinej belorusskoj krupnoj beloj porody [Theoretical and practical techniques and methods of creating and using pigs of the Belarusian large white breed: a monograph]. Zhodino [in Russian].
• 6. Rajnai, C., Biber, E., & Demeter, G. (2001). Tenyészkocák reprodukciós paramétereinek újszeriü értékelése ç ekonómiai vonatkozásai. Acta Agraria Kaposváriensis, 5 (3), 25–40.
• 7. Strunnikov, V. A. (1994). Priroda geterozisa i metody ego povyshenija [The nature of heterosis and methods of its increase]. Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
• 8.Tserenyuk, O. M. (2018). Metodolohiia vyznachennia efektu heterozysu v svynarstvi [Methodology for determining the effect of heterosis in pig breeding]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu tvarynnytstva NAAN [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science of the National Academy of Agrarian Science of Ukraine]. Kharkiv, 119, 173–184 [in Ukrainian].
• 9. Karatieieva, O. I., & Rudenko, O. M. (2018). Kombinatsiina minlyvist vidtvoriuvalnoi zdatnosti svynei velykoi biloi porody pry riznykh metodakh rozvedennia [Combination variability of reproductive capacity of the Large White pigs in different breeding methods]. Young Scientist, 1 (53), 7–10 [in Ukrainian].
• 10. Stavetska, R. V. (2015). Vplyv henotypu knuriv na reproduktyvni yakosti svynomatok [Influence of boar genotype on reproductive qualities of sows]. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva [Animal Husbandry Products Production and Processing]. Bila Tserkva, 1, 65–70 [in Ukrainian].
• 11. Pelykh, V. G., Ushakova, S. V., & Levchenko, M. V. (2020). Vysokoproduktyvni varianty poiednanʹ knuriv ta svynomatok importnykh mʺiasnykh henotypiv [Highly productive variants of combinations of boars and sows of imported meat genotypes]. Intehratsiia osvity, nauky ta biznesu v suchasnomu seredovyshchi: zymovi dysputy, tezy dopovidei I Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi internetkonferentsii [Integration of education, science and business in the modern environment: winter disputes, Proceedings of the Internetional Scientific and Practical Conference] [in Ukrainian].
• 12. Ushakova, S. V. (2020). Varianty sochetanij hrjakov i svinomatok mjasnyh genotipov po urovnju reproduktivnyh kachestv [Variants of combinations of boars and sows of meat genotypes on the level of reproductive qualities]. Retrieved from http://dspace.ksau.kherson.ua/handle/123456789/1025 [in Russian].
• 13. Hryshyna. L. P., & Fesenko, O. H. (2015). Efektyvnist vykorystannia spetsializovanoho typu svynei za skhreshchuvannia ta hibrydyzatsii [Efficiency of use of the specialized type of pigs for crossing and hybridization]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky Prychornomoria [Ukrainian Black Sea region agrarian science]. Mykolaiv, 2 ( 2), 40–48 [ in Ukrainian].
• 14. Kovalenko, V. N., & Gnatjuk, S. I. (2016). Ispolʹzovanye termynalʹnykh khryakov zarubezhnoy selektsyy v systeme vosproyzvodstva svyney [Use of terminal boars of foreign selection in the system of pig reproduction]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu tvarynnytstva NAAN [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science of the National Academy of Agrarian Science of Ukraine]. Kharkiv, 110, 71–75 [in Russian].
• 15. Akimov, S. V., Peretjat'ko, L. G., & Fesenko, O. G. (2007). Perspektivy ispol'zovanija svinej otechestvennyh mjasnyh porod v sistemah razvedenija i gibridiza [Prospects for the use of pigs of domestic meat breeds in breeding and hybridization systems]. Svynarstvo [Pig breeding]. Poltava, 55, 16–19 [in Russian].
• 16. Koval, O. A., & Kalynychenko, H. I. (2013). Vplyv skhreshchuvannia na vidtvornu zdatnist svynomatok [Influence of crossbreeding on the reproductive capacity of sows]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Podilskoho derzhavnoho ahrarnoho universytetu
[Collection of scientific works of Podolsk State Agrarian University]. Kam’ianetsPodilskyi, 21, 127–129 [in Ukrainian].
• 17. Korotkov, V. A., Vasylieva, O. A., & Zhelizniak, I. M. (2015). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok pry skhreshchuvanni z terminalnymy knuramy [Reproductive qualities of sows when crossed with terminal boars]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky Prychornomoria [Ukrainian Black Sea region agrarian science]. Mykolaiv, 2(2), 104– 107 [in Ukrainian].
• 18. Ostapchuk, P. S. (2012). Kombinatsiina zdatnistʹ vidtvornykh yakostei svynomatok za umov mizhporodnoho poiednannia [Combination ability of reproductive qualities of sows under the conditions of interbreeding]. Svynarstvo [Pig Breeding]. Poltava, 60, 66–70 [in Ukrainian].
• 19. Vovk, V. (2013). Heterozysnyi efekt pry poiednanni riznykh henotypiv svynei [Heterosis effect at combining different genotypes of pigs]. Tvarynnytstvo Ukrainy, 12, 11–13 [in Ukrainian].